EKS vs AKS vs GKE

EKS vs AKS vs GKE #

Amazon EKS, Azure AKS, and Google GKE all run managed Kubernetes, but their operational models differ across identity, networking, add-ons, observability, and ecosystem fit.

Start before comparing clouds: If your team is still learning cluster operations, complete the Kubernetes Deep Dive: Minikube to AKS/EKS before making a managed-service decision.

Quick comparison #

Area EKS AKS GKE
Best fit AWS-native platforms and broad service integration Microsoft identity, policy, and enterprise governance Kubernetes-first teams and Google Cloud managed operations
Workload identity IAM Roles for Service Accounts and related AWS identity patterns Microsoft Entra Workload ID and managed identities Workload Identity Federation
Networking focus VPC-native design, AWS load balancers, security groups, CNI planning Azure CNI options, Azure load balancers, policy integration VPC-native clusters, strong managed networking defaults
Operations Deep AWS ecosystem, explicit add-on and node lifecycle choices Strong integration with Azure Monitor, Policy, and landing zones Mature managed cluster operations and Autopilot option

Choose EKS when #

  • Your workloads already depend heavily on AWS services.
  • Your platform standard is multi-account AWS governance.
  • You need tight IAM integration and AWS-native networking controls.

Choose AKS when #

  • Your organization standardizes on Microsoft Entra ID and Azure Policy.
  • Your landing zone model is built around Azure subscriptions and management groups.
  • You want close integration with Azure DevOps, GitHub, Azure Monitor, and Key Vault.

Choose GKE when #

  • Kubernetes is central to your platform strategy.
  • You value managed operations options and Google Cloud-native observability.
  • Your workloads benefit from Google Cloud data, analytics, or AI services nearby.

Decision questions #

  1. Which cloud already hosts your databases, identity controls, and core dependencies?
  2. Which provider’s IAM model can your team operate safely?
  3. How much node, add-on, and networking lifecycle management do you want to own?
  4. Which observability and security tooling is already standardized?
  5. What regional availability, quota, and cost constraints affect production workloads?